Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird by Wallace Stevens

Okay, this is going to be the best poetry blog imaginable. Mostly, of course, because I fully believe this excellent poetry blog will raise my grade 1.6% or so, giving me that final grade I need for the honors diploma. We'll see, haha.

This poem I looked at in my poetry packet and after reading the first stanza turned to the next poem but I decided that if I put some time into it I could understand it. It took a little research, but I think I finally get it. The blackbird is a common symbol of hidden secrets, or wisdom and intelligence. The number 13 in the title is significant because religiously it is considered an odd number. It usually is seen as bad luck and holds many mysteries. So then the title really could mean "unusual ways of looking at the mysteries of intelligence" perhaps.

Stanza I begins very literally, describing a mountain side in which the only thing moving is the "eye of the blackbird." The eye is supposed to represent the all-knowing ways of the universe that, apparently, only the blackbird knows of.

Stanza II talks of "three minds" that the narrator is a made of. There were a couple interpretations I read online that suggested Stevens is talking about Freud's theory of the three parts of human conscious- the id, ego, and superego. Stevens then makes that a metaphor "like a tree/ in which there are three blackbirds." I believe this metaphor means that the blackbird understands each part of the human brain.

Stanza III gives the blackbird a sense of helplessness. He was "whirled" around by the wind, only a small part of the cycle of life. The blackbird perhaps doesn't want to be the symbol he is, or doesn't want to know what he does, but yet he is part of a bigger picture.

Stanza IV evolves from the idea of the bigger picture comparing how "a man and a woman/ Are one" to the universe. Just as "A man and a woman and a blackbird/ Are one." This interpretation of the blackbird displays the belief that everything is a part of the "oneness" of the universe.

Stanza V is my favorite stanza. It says "I do not know which to prefer,/The beauty of inflections/ Or the beauty of innuendoes,/ the blackbird whistling/ Or just after." This stanza talks about inflections of speech, such as the whistles of the blackbirds of the speaking of humans and also the beauty of silence. I think Stevens here is looking at his fifth way to look at Blackbirds is to listen to the silence that follows the song.

After stanza V there is a tone shift. It shifts from observational and calm, to somewhat darker, mysterious, and fretful.

Stanza VI echos stanza V. This stanza was the most difficult for me to wrap my mind around it. I think the first 4 lines are, as stated in stanza V, inflections. They are vivid descriptions of a cold, and almost broken world. The last three lines are the "innuendos." "The mood/ Traced in the shadow/ An indecipherable cause." I think this stanza means humans tend to see the "inflections." We see the broken houses and world, but we don't understand it. Stevens is saying that blackbirds understand all the mysteries of the world. They understand the underlying mood, when humans tend to only understand the tone. It also is the first case of the classic study of cause and effect, the humans noticing the effect, and the birds understanding the cause.

Stanza VII begins with the apostrophe to the people of Haddam. Haddam is a town south of where Stevens grew up. Though it's pretty far away, it's somewhat similar to us talking to the people of Denver, or maybe even Fort. Collins, it's just a neighboring town. He calls the men "thin," which isn't literal, but rather refers to their lack of perspective. He asks why they "imagine golden birds?" Basically, in this stanza he asks why they are never happy with what is around them and why they cannot appreciate the beauty of the blackbird, just as they under appreciate the intelligence of women.

Stanza VIII is interesting. Stevens begins by saying "I know noble accents." The first thought could be that there is a sense of ego in Steven's self-image, but realistically he is a Harvard graduate and a professional writer, so I would hope he would know the most eloquent language. What he goes on to say is one of the main themes of the poem. He says that even though he knows all these things about language, he doesn't know anything that the blackbird doesn't. What he means by this is that men struggle with the language of men, but the blackbird speaks the language of the universe. This also demeans education in a way. Despite how learned you are, if one cannot understand nature and the basics of the world their intelligence is void.

Stanza IX introduces the phase of death into the previously mentioned cycle of life. Stevens uses the symbol of the circle, meaning the entire cycle of life and existence. He says that the blackbird "marked the edge." Now to be honest, this stanza I understand the surface level interpretation but beyond that I am a little lost. I do not understand how the blackbird defines life by defining death. It's all very confusing, but I'm thinking that Stevens is saying that the blackbird doesn't actually die. Yes, individual blackbirds die but as a whole they remain as human lives fade in and out and their all-knowing eye mentioned in the first stanza remains.

Stanza X introduces another tone shift. Here is introduced a sense of fear and guilt. The "green light" mentioned reminds me of the hue left after war or famine. It is a common reference, I believe, to death and destruction. Stevens goes on to say that "Even the bawds of euphony/ Would cry out sharply." Euphony being language or sounds that are pleasing. So he is saying that even the sweetest sounds humans can make would turn in to shrill cries when the blackbirds are sighted, here the blackbird representing our conscious of our guilt.

Stanza XI continues the theme of guilt as a man is described riding through Connecticut in a glass carriage, but mistakes shadows of his carriage as the blackbirds coming for him. Like in the tenth stanza, here the black bird is used for a symbol of death, like the ravens that clean the fleshes of corpses. It's pretty morbid. Stevens here talks about living in sin, or in a state of guilt, and trying to ignore that and live a life that seems great in your glass carriage, but your whole life you will be haunted by the shadows of fears. It's really a fantastic stanza.

Stanza XII is the most simple of the thirteen. It is another cause and effect relationship. He says "The river is moving/ The blackbird must be flying." The river is a symbol for life and as long as it is flowing, intelligence, or the blackbird, must be flying.

Stanza XIII concludes the poem with death. It's a very happy sort of poem. He mentions evening and snow beginning to fall, which is a metaphor for the final stages of life. After the death occurs, Stevens writes "The blackbird sat/ In the cedar limbs." I think this final stanza ties everything together. In a majority of the stanzas the blackbird is a symbol for intelligence, but in the last few it is a symbol for death and in the final stanza Stephen wraps it together making it a symbol for both. The blackbird was present for the death but in the form of intelligence it still remains. Meaning after we die, our intellect and our contributions still remain. Now this interpretation is not really anything I found online but it made the most sense to me otherwise the symbols change throughout the poem, which can happen, but I feel like the bird is really symbolizing both in the final stanza.

Eating Poetry by Mark Strand

This has to be the craziest poem I have read in a while, but I am completely drawn to it!I knew it wasn't literal from the beginning but I could not for the life of me deduce a meaning for the metaphor. I read several interpretations online but none really fit for me. So I came up with this: this poem is about a man who has discovered poetry. He is "crazy" about them, hence the image of a man eating poetry with ink running down his face. Each stanza seems to have a tone shift. The second one I think represents us as the reader. The librarian, or us, judge or gawk at this man in such a crazy state over a few simple words. It's something we are not accustomed to. The readers are not supposed to have a strong opinion on poetry. The third stanza is where it gets really weird. I think Strand uses the dog as a symbol of critics of poetry; this could also be us as readers, but more likely it is those with premeditated opinions. The dogs continue to the third stanza violently attacking the man who just discovered poetry and the library is the observer, still not completely taking a side. She is frightened, unsure which side to take until the man turns into a dog as well?? I don't think the symbol of the dog continues as a critic. He starts by licking the librarians hand, and she is frightened by him. He has transformed and is trying to share his new found passion with her. In the last stanza he says, "I am a new man." He snarls, and then "romp(s) with joy in the bookish dark." Hmm?? So I am thinking he has transformed with his new discovery and he is determined to not give up this passion for anything, not even for the all mighty librarian. He has conquered himself and accepted his new joys. I don't know for sure. This poem was a bit of a stretch, but I still really enjoyed it!

Writing by Jan Dean

Writing

and then i saw it
saw it all all the mess
and blood and everythink
and mam agenst the kichin dor
the flor all stiky
and the wall all wet
and red and dad besid the kitchen draw
i saw it saw it all
an wrot it down an ever word of it is tru

You must take care to write in sentences,
Checky your spellings and your paragraphs.
Is this finished? It is rather short.
Perhaps next time you will have more to say.

Jan Dean

This poem is rather interesting. The first time I read it, I laughed assuming this was a commentary on how ridiculous the lack of editing can be. But then I really actually on the first stanza, the one nearly impossible to read. It was then I realized the italics were not the important part of the poem. In the first stanza you read in broken English about a broken home. It sounds to me like this child has witnessed abuse. The teacher goes on to comment about the grammar of it, asking, "Is this finished?... Perhaps next time you will have more to say." What this teacher did not realize is this child said everything, everything there was to say, but she was too involved with her world of editing to notice the intent of the author. This poem really is a commentary on ignoring the signs of abuse and this poem is an incredible way of saying it.

When I Heard the Learn'd Astronomer by Walt Whitman

Walt Whitman is one of my favorite poets and this piece of his just makes me smile. It's one of his simpler poems. He speaks of a lecture he attended where an impressive astronomer spoke. This poem is rather narrative and doesn't use as much figurative language as most poems I write about on here. He spends four lines describing the astronomer's lecture and then writes, "How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick." I know how you feel, Walt. I love learning. Well, most of the time. But so often I sit in the room suffocating with the lack of significance of the lesson prepared. It was especially bad in Trig! Anyway, Whitman goes on to wander outside and looks up at the stars in all their beauty. The author's meaning is so sweet and SIMPLE. He is saying we spend too much time studying, explaining, justifying and not enough time enjoying. I love this philosophy. I have been reflecting on my life and have realized, like Whitman, things are too complicated. I have spent so many hours doing homework over watching a movie with my mom. Life is best in its simplest form. We cannot force explanations for miracles. To me, my family is a miracle. We are so happy. I hardly know another family like mine. Rather than ignoring the beauty of my family, only to aspire to the honors of the world I want to sit back and enjoy it. I don't want to memorize the constellations, only marvel up at the night sky.

Kafkaesque Cartoon

I definately had this done next Sunday but I saw on the blogs we're supposed to update it now? Is this our poetry blog for the week?

Much Madness is Divinest Sense

Much madness is divinest sense

To a discerning eye,

Much sense, the starkest madness.

‘Tis the majority

In this, as all, prevail:

Assent, and you are sane;

Demur, you’re straightway dangerous

And handled with a chain. -Emily Dickinson

I know I have said this a thousand times... I LOVE EMILY DICKINSON! She's brilliant. It took me a few readings to actually understand it. What really gave it away is when I looked up "Assent" and "Demur." To assent with something is to agree or concur. And then of course to demur with something is to disagree or argue it. This poem is once again speaking of conformity. The voice of the public who speaks against common knowledge is often considered 'mad' but she twists the word 'mad' from insanity to brilliance. This is a very clever social commentary on how society treats abstract thinkers. Rather than value the ingenuity, the brilliance is often tosses aside as mad ravings. Although it is a simple meaning, Dickinson has a very novel way of saying it which makes this poem more enjoyable than most.

Engagement- by Adam Sol

Engagement

The young man knows he's going to die today, but he's wrong.

The other young man figures the army is the best way to improve his life,
but he's wrong.
They both think their weapons will protect them, but they're wrong.
They both believe their prayers will help.

Their commanders have intentions and intelligence, but they're wrong.
We've heard the story before. It's wrong.
The news will document it, but it will be wrong.
The war on terror, the war on Islam, the clash of civilizations.

The explosion will exceed the necessity of the occasion.
The exchange of fire will be unbalanced.
The response will be disproportionate.
The reporter is factually incorrect, theoretically misinformed, morally
reprehensible.

The clear typeface and perfect binding are misleading.
The reader is uncomfortably and inappropriately implicated.
The tranquil mind is insufficient to the task.
The young men, necks dirty and damp, advance.

Adam Sol

This poem is really interesting. It has a very obvious meaning but yet such a unique way of saying it. His poems is a social commentary on the Iraq war. In his first stanza he ends each line by saying, "but he's wrong." He discusses two young boys' hopes and how they are wrong. Sol's last line, "They both think their prayers will help." Perhaps since this line doesn't end with the typical "but he's wrong" the author thinks they are right. But most likely not. I think the author sincerely thinks that God has no place in war, but he leaves it up for the readers to pause and decide for themselves. The second stanza is formatted very similarly, except he moves up the food chain. He discusses the higher forces of war- the commanders, the media, and the home front- mentioning the errors in that. His last line takes the media and image of war out of the picture and states the truth, that war is just war. Sol's next two stanzas go on to list the flaws of war, both the coverage of war and the act of war. What is most powerful is his last line, "The young men, necks dirty and damp, advance." After looking at the complexity of war, all it really boils down to is the young men fighting for it. I don't think Sol is necessarily anti-war, but he is against unnecessary war. Yes, there are times we need to fight, but Sol believes their are times to stand aside as well.

God-Fearing by Phillip Fried

God-fearing

He's the catastrophe we strive to cap
with ice-like hydrates, blowout preventer stacks.
Gushing spill in a world of scarcity.
Hemorrhage of energy, despite every
tourniquet of containment. Infinite spew.
Staunchless plume of animacules, the nimble
swimmers jostling in any cubic centimeter.
Plenty's horn, the topsy-turvy tornado.

We are engineers, contriving options,
tapping and funneling, drilling counter wells
that will never arrive at the infant Omnipotence
who rock-a-byes inside us, the purler that broke
the goat's horn.
North is stretched out over the empty
place. Earth hangs upon Nothing. Myth is irrevocable.

Phillip Fried

This poem is so enormous in complexity-yet it's so simple. It really reminded me of those question poems we wrote in class and the one she read us, "Questions We Have About God." I think what Fried is really asking here is why is God so complex, and more importantly, will he ever understand Him. This underlying question is hard to find, especially because the writing itself is so complex. In a way, that was how Fried asked his question. In his initial stanza, he wrote describing God using complicated imagery and truly beautiful language. This is where he asks why God is so hard to understand. He sees the destruction of the earth, the beauty of the earth, he sees all of God's creations but he does not understand. He cannot fathom God's purpose, his hand in everything. In his second stanza, he writes "We are engineers." We are the authors of our destiny is basically what he is saying. Fried is trying to understand the delicate balance of fate vs. free will. He wants to know if he has a hand in God's plan. His last two lines are his conclusion, and sadly those are the two lines that confuse me the most. I think he has concluded that there is beauty in insignificance. It is alright to question and not understand as long as we find beauty in the nothingness.

I have to explain this week's artwork! So... when I think of this poem the mosaic art really came to mind. I found a stain glass window that was just perfect. It looks so complex, yet really it is just made of tiny pieces. It's a symbol for the questions of the universe!

What the Seed Knows by Anita Skeen

What the Seed Knows

winter plods on like a Russian novel, spring
hints, haiku

tight blouses unbutton, jackets unzip,
skin is not just skin

rich soil proliferates
in the heart, in the hand
that can never let go

rivers flow unseen, underground, unfettered
unfathomable

some dig down, some rise up
some survive

sleep is not dreamless:
how else the orange, the dogwood?
the phalanx of asparagus?

coddled in the pod,
all the seed needs:

darkness, more snug
than light

grit splits the rock, raises
a tiny fist, screams
the world into profusion
of petaled racket

to uncurl and unfurl
to unhusk from the crust

to inhale, exhale
turn toward what's bright

Anita Skeen

Well, once again it appears I'm behind a poetry blog. I don't know quite how this happens, yet somehow every four blogs or so I notice I'm one short. Anyway, I found this poem on this new website I discovered. It's called Poems Daily (http://poems.com/poem.php?date=15047). It's really a cool website! Each day they publish a poem written by one person or another. I love it. It's like a little taste of cleverness in the morning. This poem above is so interesting. Just scroll up and look at it, without reading it as a whole. Even the words that pop out and the form is just so unique. I love how each stanza starts a new idea that is still an enjambment from above. How she indents the second line of each stanza is very unique, which is strange when it comes to interpretation. I think Skeen was trying to say through the poem that the best things in life, the most natural and real, are the simple things. Something as simple as a seed can still produce a staple of life. What interests me is her structure in not as simple as you would think- it's not the standard poem. Yet, in a way, it's a perfect balance of simple and unique. In her second stanza she says, "tight blouses unbutton, jackets unzip, skin is not just skin. " This is what I think is really the theme of this piece: sometimes we take everything too seriously. What we need instead is to realax; unzip our jackets and sit back and let life be simply marvelous. All we need to do is "inhale, exhale/turn towards what's bright."

Questioning Perfection

Questioning Perfection

What defines perfections- flaws or the lack thereof?
Is there one perfect form or many?
Is perfection a reality?

Isn't perfection subjective??

Why do I hate perfection, yet never stop seeking it?
If perfection is so impossible, how did we form a concept of it?

If the standard is set low enough, is everything perfection?

Perhaps, just perhaps, perfection is a mere idea
Incepted into our hearts to both taunt and taint-
but never to redeem.

-AP Lit group (With a little editing here and there.)

Awake by Katherine Foreman

Awake

My last night as a full-time child
I didn't want to sleep, for fear of
Waking up in a rustle of too-crisp sheets
And a creak of inadequate bedsprings
With a lightly snoring virtual stranger eight feet away.
And also I didn't want it to be tomorrow,
Because then it would be time to do what
I've denied for three weeks of subsistence
And oblivion--ignoring is bliss.
And I saw everything I never did
Lying around me, pieces and steps of the
Success I never got, reminders that
Whatever I planned, I never got far.
But in the middle of these broken promises
To myself, I could see for the first time
That I have not been broken.
And I must keep myself, all that is real,
As daybreak does, and nightfall.
I exist to others, but all I need is me.
I will be the last promise, when all is said
And kept.

I was looking at this free-verse poetry website and stumbled onto this poem. It's spectacular! I love it so much! It's a coming to age poem, which is basically where I am in life. The author speaks of how intimidated she is by her future. I love how she uses the overly crisp sheets and bedsprings as symbols of uncomfortable situations. I also love the line "I exist to others, but all I need is me." I guess she is saying we all use people to get ahead; we learn from them, we love them, we trust them. Sometimes they fail us or do us wrong. In the end, however, all you really need is yourself and the confidence that you will succeed. Other people are nice accessories to life. This poem has a really calm tone, very reflective. What I don't understand about it is the last two lines. The regular saying is "when as is said and done," yet Foreman says, "when all is said and kept." I feel as though those lines are very significant, but I don't understand what she meant by it, what the big difference is.

Introduction to Poetry- Billy Collins

I realized somewhere along the way I fell behind an entry so here's another one for this week!

This poem sounds so familiar! I'm pretty sure we read it at the beginning of the year. It's a very simple poem; simple but clever. The author speaks so eloquently of his desire to have his students discover themselves through poetry- to find light in the poems. Instead, the students "begin beating it with a hose" and "torture a confession out of it." Sadly, I completely understand what he is talking about! I always feel like there is an "answer" to the poem. Instead of sitting back and enjoying the meat of the poem, we furrow our brows and force comprehension.
"Introduction to Poetry" is a free verse written by a professor. It really is a nice poem. It has no deep theme and although the mood is light, it is evident Collins is truly passionate about poetry. Collins adds sensory details to connect with the audience. He uses such nice imagery to portray the joy he finds in prose.

Song of the Powers by David Mason

This poem is really a nice, dark twist on the child's game rock, paper, scissors. It clearly speaks of destruction and how futile violence truly is. We discussed this poem in class and I brought up this idea, which might be completely off. I think the rock might be symbolic of the government, the paper of religion, and the scissors of military. Each generally conflicts with the other and no one can stand alone. His structure is really interesting- he begins with three sestets describing the rock, paper, and scissors. He then concludes with a final stanza that breaks that form. His last words are really interesting:

"As the stone crushes scissors,
as paper snuffs stone
and scissors cut paper,
all end alone.
So heap up your paper
and scissors your wishes
and uproot the stone
from the top of the hill.
They all end alone.
As you will, you will."

All three have a viscous cycle of destruction- the battle between religion and government, conflicting with the military. This poem really has a dark tone, almost mid-evil even. It's really interesting, and actually pretty depressing.

Desert Places- Robert Frost

This week I decided rather than rave about how brilliant a poem is, I'm going to write about how much I hate it. Robert Frost- all around neutral kinda guy. I mean, sure he's a credited poet that we read from our plastic elementary chairs, but has he ever written anything of substance?? Robert Frost plays it safe. I honestly think he writes just to be read. Take this poem, for instance. Loneliness is one of the most common emotions! You can't go wrong that. It's exactly like The Kite Runner- everyone just loved it, but I saw how the author just knew how to spin every human emotion into a dramatic plot and it would be an automatic success. It's the exact same here with this poem. The words Frost writes are actually rather nice. He adds nice touches with the symbolism of the woods and delicate metaphors such as, "all animals are smothered in their lairs." The two lines I really enjoyed from this poem are in the third stanza: "And lonely as it is that loneliness will be more lonely ere it will be less." I think I love those lines because I honestly don't understand them. They just sound so nice! I feel like the rest of the poem just failed and these two lines could stand alone. Maybe he was trying to say the more lonely we are the less loneliness bothers us. I just can't figure out an interpretation that seems to suit. Other than those two lines I think the symbolism of the desert was boring and predicable, the quatrain format merely standard, and found no superb brilliance to this piece whatsoever.

"Reading Myself" by Robert Lowell

Robert Lowell was a renowned poet of the early 20th century. He won several awards, including the Pulitzer Prize, which makes this poem ironic. He writes, " Somehow never wrote something to go back to." In this poem, Lowell tells of his desire to write something of substance. He says, "I memorized the tricks to set the river on fire"- or rather, he knows the tricks to writing a good poem. He plays words as we would cards. He has no problem tossing together a string of words and accepting the praise of his ingenuity. He speaks of Parnassus- the mountain in Greek mythology that is "the seat of music and poetry;" he has earned a seat on the slopes, but he has long to go before he can reach the peaks. I think we all like to wonder around the slopes. We live for excuses, so we do not have to reach our potential. The magnanimity- or rather the undetermined capacity of mankind is intimidating. We admire the greatness of humanity from our rocking chair on our front porch, perhaps too afraid to know our own capacity. Just food for thought.

"Untiled" by Stephan Crane

Untitled

In the desert

I saw a creature, naked, bestial,

Who, squatting upon the ground,

Held his heart in his hands,

And ate of it.

I said: "Is it good, friend?"

"It is bitter-bitter," he answered;

"But I like it

Because it is bitter,

And because it is my heart."

-Stephan Crane

(I apologize Mrs. White, I'm pretty sure this is the ONLY poem you're going to hear about this week, but I like it!)

So apparently this poem is very dark and bleak, but I felt like it was just very calm. I think it's a social commentary on the decay of mankind, but like Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby," there was no drive of call to duty. Crane was commenting on how mankind is gradually becoming more and more selfish, yet, in a twisted sort of way, we like our selfishness. I think Crane used the symbol of the creature to represent mankind in the most natural state. Our heart is symbolic of our intentions or desires. It's also interesting to me how simple his wording is, yet it's so descriptive without being verbose! I think it really adds a nice, dark tone to this little piece. It has a minimalistic feel, which again reminds me the simplest form of mankind.

Personal Helicon by Seamus Heaney

This poem was written by Seamus Heaney, an Irish professor. It really sounds to me like a 'middle-aged' poem; it was written at a point where there was a lack of direction. I don't think I'm quite there yet. My life seems so perfectly planned out for me, but I'm certain that in everyone's life there comes a point where you sit and wonder how you got there, to that point in life, and ponder your next step. This is why people get sex changes at 40! The author's diction felt eloquent, yet still impressive and interesting which contributed to the middle-aged, mature style. Anyway, there are plenty of poems out there that speak of direction, but "Personal Helicon" stood out in the way in which it was written. The authors uses metaphors and symbolism to emphasize his point. The well, for instance, is symbolic of a dark time in one's life when it is hard to see one's identity. The flower and root are symbolic of the flower being the facade or one's appearance, and the roots being one's hidden qualities and strengths. The use of symbolism and metaphors gave the poem a sense of an unclear setting... almost like fog. Which in itself is another symbol. The poem had a nice tone to it; it felt somber, perhaps a little melancholy even, yet there was a nice sense of indignation to it. Almost like the author was realizing he wanted a change of direction, yet acknowledged it was in his control. I really enjoyed this poem. I felt like it effectively conveyed a message while still connecting with an audience.